Its biology is, technically speaking, identical to its victim, making it indistinguishable from the genuine article. Thanks to the assimilation process, its entire body changes to match its most recent victim, down to the cellular level. The creature doesn't even have a true form–there is no "default" version of its body that it reverts to. The way the creature spreads itself makes it almost impossible to know what it actually looks like. The appearance in those movies differs greatly from the 1951 version of the creature, which is depicted as a humanoid plant, complete with seed pods, that drains its victims of blood. While there are some slight differences, the 2011 version of the monster remains largely similar, as it is a direct prequel to the 1982 film. ![]() Carpenter provides evidence that The Thing has likely assimilated dozens if not hundreds of different organisms before it attacks the humans it encounters in Antarctica, as it's shown with razor-sharp teeth, spider-like legs, tentacles and other distinctly non-human body parts. One of the things that makes John Carpenter's version of The Thing so terrifying is the practical effects used to depict the creature's transformation. Related: The Thing Theory Suggests That There Were 2 Opposing Creatures In Howard Hawks' original 1951 film The Thing From Another World it appears as a plant-based life form, while in the 1938 science fiction novella Who Goes There? that first introduced the story, it appears as a blue-haired creature with three eyes. ![]() In John Carpenter's 1982 masterpiece The Thing and its 2011 prequel of the same name, the creature presents itself in a number of unsettling forms, many of which involve gruesome mid-transition features.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |